Posts: 87
Joined: 2005-06-01
|
thinkin of picking up a pair wot's peoples opinions on the them??
|
|
|
|
Posts: 1323
Joined: 2004-05-09
|
Very on trend.
|
|
|
Posts: 54264
Joined: 2003-07-10
|
Ronald wrote:
Very on trend.
|
|
|
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2005-09-27
|
i really like them got a couple of my dads old pairs from years ago, but dont know if i should be wearing them because of the trend factor
|
|
|
Posts: 8656
Joined: 2004-02-24
|
Noble Locks. wrote:
Ronald wrote:
Very BOHO SIENNA KATE PETE NU-RAVE DIOR HOMME NO RESERVE B.I.N.
|
|
|
Posts: 2548
Joined: 2005-05-29
|
they are above trends.
|
|
|
Posts: 8547
Joined: 2003-07-02
|
Ray BAN
|
|
|
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2005-09-27
|
|
|
|
Posts: 13198
Joined: 2005-05-09
|
Me no likey
|
|
|
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2005-09-27
|
oh and they're £120ish quid, you pay that for them you a foo'
|
|
|
Posts: 54264
Joined: 2003-07-10
|
Fuck Ray Bann!!!!
|
|
|
Posts: 12188
Joined: 2003-11-27
|
I actually hate them which puts me in a bad position for this summer when every c*nt will be wearing them. Im all for retro shit and stuff but I just dont think they're suitable in this day and age.
I've never thought they looked good. never.
|
|
|
Posts: 2548
Joined: 2005-05-29
|
FrIEND wrote:
I actually hate them which puts me in a bad position for this summer when every c*nt will be wearing them. Im all for retro shit and stuff but I just dont think they're suitable in this day and age.
I've never thought they looked good. never.
what? 
|
|
|
Posts: 4424
Joined: 2005-05-03
|
|
|
|
Posts: 54264
Joined: 2003-07-10
|
get the new fangled modern version like i did yesterday.
|
|
|
Posts: 12188
Joined: 2003-11-27
|
to me they look cheap - the edges sit too far away from your face, the edges stick out like a pair of dame ednas specs - and that fancy silver bit on the corner can piss off too.
there's just no need for them now - lots of better glasses to choose from nowadays imo...the only reason they're coming up again is becuase of wank stains like doherty wearing them.
|
|
|
Posts: 12188
Joined: 2003-11-27
|
Noble Locks. wrote:
get the new fangled modern version like i did yesterday.
exactly
|
|
|
Posts: 1107
Joined: 2003-08-15
|
FrIEND wrote:
I actually hate them which puts me in a bad position for this summer when every c*nt will be wearing them. Im all for retro shit and stuff but I just dont think they're suitable in this day and age.
I've never thought they looked good. never.
That puts you in a good position doesnt it -you can get something no-one else is wearing???
mase wrote:
oh and they're £120ish quid, you pay that for them you a foo'
Agreed -especially considering you could easily pick them up for just over half that price by doing a quick search on the interweb, mate.
|
|
|
Posts: 2548
Joined: 2005-05-29
|
you cant rip one of the most famous eyewear designs ever,
if you know how to wear them they are cool as fuk
|
|
|
Posts: 12188
Joined: 2003-11-27
|
I think this boy has got alot to answer for
which is incredible becuase the majority of the time he's just being a messed up junkie.
I got no hate against him, but I see junkies around my town wearing all sorts of nightmare clothes because its either all they can afford or in their state of mind it looks good. strange that I dont see loads of normal people walking around in campri ski jackets and crushed velvet trousers*..but I can imagine if pete the indie junkie did it instead of Micheal the homeless junkie doing it then the country would soon follow.
*please note that I realise shithot probably rocked that look days ago.
I dont beleive many people choose what they wear because of its classic design.
|
|
|
Posts: 2548
Joined: 2005-05-29
|
classic design is by definition something that looks good.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri, 20/04/2007 - 11:01am
