How is that cliquey? Its a fashion forum where the majority of people are into the same brands and generaly share a certain style. If a new poster came on with a pair of APC jeans and a Raf tee it would be welcomed and wouldnt cause this sort of stir. The only reason this is being debated is because, imo, Hoolios casuals style doesnt fit with what the majority of people who post on here like.

My point is that whatever hoolio says or wears wont be appreciated by the majority of people on here, because this isnt a casuals forum where peopple will appreciate his lifestyle/dress/brands hes into.

And when he's posting shit like this:
"i certainly wont be taking advice from those who wear fluffy scarves, winkle picker shoes or cram as much supreme/silas/bape etc onto themselves to create a look", then it doesnt look like hes even trying to fit in or appreciate other peoples posts, hes just whinging that no one is loving his look, cock.

d,itto',

yeah ok mate it is a board for clobber though, im not after an english lesson

ASOS's bargain bin doesn't count.

im sick of saying this, i posted a pic up, what the thread is about, and someone asked what style i thought i was wearing, i said casual, again posts from others on here saying this is casual or not etc, i even said to robii "forget it", simple isnt it really, take the blinkers off its pathetic

sometimes it takes time to separate the trolls/wankers from the good 'uns

somebody who aims to be provocative and to seek attention.

the_fear

i must admit i didnt get the scream up for that 'michael jackson' shout, cos that jacket does look a bit like the one in 'billie jean' (i think), but you and soul stylist do both come across as you are lecturing everyone in a lot of your posts (the clubbing thread for instance).
i sometimes feel like im being tried to be subliminably taught stuff rather than just reading your thoughts on a fashion forum.
just type how you would normally talk to mates imo and then you can never go wrong on here…all that superior stuff is more suited for superfuture, this is more of a relaxed gaff.