Ask Alex, he's the expert… apparently…
Archive: best/worst
Show original post
10 Jul 2011 23:06
Adverse inferences can be drawn in court from doing that. Not sure why Jordan would answer with "no comment", his story really does not add up at all.
11 Jul 2011 00:17
Adverse inferences can be drawn in court from doing that. Not sure why Jordan would answer with "no comment", his story really does not add up at all.
well it's worked well enough for many people so far. Any decent brief can effectively attack advers inference in court - it's much better to be in position in court 'explaining' events than being tripped up in a cell and incrimincating yourself
always respond to questions when you're in a cell with 'no comment' (apart from the obvious name, address and dob). Even 'nice weather today isn't it?' should be a 'no comment'
You should have taken a brief with you Jordan
You should have taken a brief with you Jordan
Adverse inferences can be drawn in court from doing that. Not sure why Jordan would answer with "no comment", his story really does not add up at all.
always respond to questions when you're in a cell with 'no comment' (apart from the obvious name, address and dob). Even 'nice weather today isn't it?' should be a 'no comment'
You should have taken a brief with you Jordan
You should have taken a brief with you Jordan
Adverse inferences can be drawn in court from doing that. Not sure why Jordan would answer with "no comment", his story really does not add up at all.
well it's worked well enough for many people so far. Any decent brief can effectively attack advers inference in court - it's much better to be in position in court 'explaining' events than being tripped up in a cell and incrimincating yourself
Sign in to post in this thread.

