24 Sep 2019 20:53
A prediction (hypothesis) is based on the evidence at the time it is often wrong because evidence is insufficient. Then you change the hypothesis. Once evidence is sufficient it’s no longer a hypothesis it’s a theory and certain. The issue with climate change is once it becomes so evident it’s certain it’s too late to make a significant change because it’s a cumulative catalytic effect.
Climate change as a complex hypothesis has been poorly communicated (often bandwagoned with political movements) and badly enforced through taxation. This will turn most people off since in nearly all circumstances it negatively effects people’s perceived quality of life now based on a perceived future. Secondly it’s asking people to take individual big hits when on a global scale the change is insignificant and likely won’t event effect the ones making a sacrifice in their life times.
Can’t really think of any comparable negative restriction on people’s lives at scale that has ever been attempted to be tried to be sold as an idea before. It is unprecedented situation and challenge.
posted 25 Sep 2019 20:16, edited 25 Sep 2019 20:16
^ I don’t get your point here. You assume there is a racist or sexist element to this? It’s only the left that sees colour and uses identity politics mate. And she literally is just pointing at all of ‘us’ to just listen to scientists. She doesn’t have an original thought in her head.
And I’m not slagging off her looks. You can just tell she’s not all there, physically and mentally and is clearly being used and manipulated.
For her to be called a voice of a generation is quite sickening.
Nothing is too low for the lefties. When people won’t listen to their ranting, they mobilise kids. She has no relevance or opinions of her own - literally is just a mouthpiece for the hardcore powers that be that are behind her.
If you want to look at real voices for change, look at the likes of Candace Owens.
25 Sep 2019 20:54
What about that Malala chick? She was ACTUALLY a phenomenon after what she went through. This kid just seems to have been raised by hippies
25 Sep 2019 21:22
^ was this your big ‘gotcha’ moment?
And um, yes that Candace Owens.
What did she say?
“If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, OK, fine,” Owens continued, while standing next to Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk.
“The problem is he wanted, he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize, he wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German, everybody to look a different way. To me, that’s not nationalism. So in thinking about how it could go bad down the line, I don’t really have an issue with nationalism, I really don’t.”
Wow, what a terrible statement to make.
But more than likely you’re a labour Corbyn lover so you hate Jews anyway plus I’m sure you’re a huge fan of Mao, Stalin, and that ilk.
Yeah Candace Owens doesn’t measure up to them on the mass murderer scale right.
25 Sep 2019 22:04
Minimising Hitler's beliefs as 'not nationalism' is as offensive as it is ahistorical.
Fudge, please, this site is already over its best years, can you please just let it go out with a little dignity.
26 Sep 2019 09:29
Someone put him out his misery. It’s actually depressing to see someone his age battle so desperately on an internet fashion forum. Go spew your bile somewhere else fudge.