I'd much rather have Willian than Pedro, his work rate is awesome. Doubt they'll get anything like that from Pedro.
General Discussion: The Premiership discussion thread
Show original post
posted 19 Aug 2015 15:40, edited 19 Aug 2015 15:40
Undoubtedly, but a lack of goals has not really been a problem for this Chelsea team.
Not saying he aint good, just not really addressing their most pressing concerns.
20 Aug 2015 12:33
Pedro is a finisher, Willian is everything but. He will add a goal threat to the right of their attack, personally I'm skeptical how well he'll adapt, but it makes a lot of sense on paper. don't really see how he changes things massively for them.
Undoubtedly, but a lack of goals has not really been a problem for this Chelsea team.
Not saying he aint good, just not really addressing their most pressing concerns.
Looks like Bolasie might be off to spurs afterall. Pardew more or less holding the door open for him with his comments today. Mixed feelings on this one. Only cost us 400k and £20mill (if the reports are true) would be an absolute steal. What I like about him is he's got skills and strength and is an entertainer (just like zaha) who have been drawing a new generation of young fans to Selhurst Park. Some games however he plays like he believes his own hype and gets nothing right. When he went to Africa Cup of Nations we didn't actually miss him and went on a bit of a winning run.
Always had a blinder against Brighton though
Always had a blinder against Brighton though

Sign in to post in this thread.