Tera Bytes fucking hell that is a serious amount of filth.
General Discussion: random news stories
Show original post
18 Dec 2013 16:10
18 Dec 2013 16:36
does he?
People lose all sense of perspective with anything like this, we don't even know the details of the case. "Attempted rape of a baby"….what exactly does that mean? did the baby fight him off? was it not physically possible? I don't know but what I do know is that attempting to rape a baby sounds pretty bad and that's all people hear.
Just goes to show that being a peado is the worst crime you can commit in our society.
The exact details of the case and what the video evidence shows can be read here:
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf
Obvious warning is that it's seriously grim stuff and it goes into a lot of distressing detail.
posted 18 Dec 2013 17:03, edited 18 Dec 2013 17:03
18 Dec 2013 17:30
Just read parts of this, wish I hadn't. One of the most sickening things I've ever read.
it's enough for me to know that he attempted to rape a baby i don't need or want to know anymore of the details to determine if he deserves that sentence.
I do wonder if the whole jimmy savile thing had any influence on the length of the sentence. Imagine the up roar if another celebrity had got away or given a light sentence.
I do wonder if the whole jimmy savile thing had any influence on the length of the sentence. Imagine the up roar if another celebrity had got away or given a light sentence.
He deserves every single year of that sentence.
does he?
People lose all sense of perspective with anything like this, we don't even know the details of the case. "Attempted rape of a baby"….what exactly does that mean? did the baby fight him off? was it not physically possible? I don't know but what I do know is that attempting to rape a baby sounds pretty bad and that's all people hear.
Just goes to show that being a peado is the worst crime you can commit in our society.
The exact details of the case and what the video evidence shows can be read here:
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf
Obvious warning is that it's seriously grim stuff and it goes into a lot of distressing detail.
There is a good argument for chemical castration to be used against prolific paedophiles. I think i read that a few have actually asked for the procedure themselves!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9139845/Paedophiles-chemically-castrated-in-British-jail.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/9139845/Paedophiles-chemically-castrated-in-British-jail.html
The exact details of the case and what the video evidence shows can be read here:
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf
Obvious warning is that it's seriously grim stuff and it goes into a lot of distressing detail.
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/r-v-watkins-and-others.pdf
Obvious warning is that it's seriously grim stuff and it goes into a lot of distressing detail.
Just read parts of this, wish I hadn't. One of the most sickening things I've ever read.
Sign in to post in this thread.